

I’m not sure I understand you.
If this is a US politics thing … I’m not USian.
A little bit of neuroscience and a little bit of computing
I’m not sure I understand you.
If this is a US politics thing … I’m not USian.
I’m genuinely curious to see how it goes!
Lucky you to have enjoy Lost Highway for the first time!
In a cinema no less!
Yep agreed. On the English language thing, I suspected but don’t know enough about him and haven’t seen enough of his films to be confident enough to claim it. But it certainly seemed to me that the writing-directing-editing just was not landing at all. I think my problem is that I picked up on it fairly early on in the film and couldn’t stop it from distracting me from the films positives.
Mickey 17 (I posted about it already, suffice it to say it’s flaws bugged me to the point of ruining the film despite me wanting to enjoy it)
Mulholland Drive (re-watch) -
I watched Lost Highway for the first time recently (both Lynch films) and wanted to compare. It made me appreciate both actually. MD is surprisingly brisk and varied and well paced in a way that sneakily draws you into a Lynch film without you really noticing or feeling it until the end … such that it’s “success” makes a lot of sense. But LH’s more gritty and disturbing atmosphere was appreciated by comparison too.
For someone seeing them for the first time, seeing them back to back could be quite cool I suspect.
It’s a tragedy how expensive it was though. They’ll never give him this budget again.
Yea this is partly why I posted, the “meta” story around the film is interesting (and sad) I think.
Interesting comparison. I think Mickey 17 is trying to be something different from Moon, with some overlapping themes. I’d say it’s more Starship Troopers and fifth element with moon-like themes.
I don’t think I’m a raging IMDb reviewer.
As I said in another comment:
As for a summary of “reasons”, I’d say it was thin on meaning and loud and discombobulated in its direction, dialogue, pacing and plotting beyond my threshold of enjoyment or even tolerance.
Beyond that, the review I linked captures my thoughts well.
In short I think it crossed a threshold for me that’s likely different for many (thus the mix of up and down votes here).
Objective was quoted to signal that it’s a loaded term.
I mentioned a number of other things besides not liking it and linked to a review that mirrored my thoughts well.
I like plenty of films (Bong’s included).
As for a summary of “reasons”, I’d say it was thin on meaning and loud and discombobulated in its direction, dialogue, pacing and plotting beyond my threshold of enjoyment or even tolerance.
Yea that’s an interesting perspective (and obviously I’d recommend staying away from the film, I think it’d only frustrate you).
Yea, also it was an established show and from what I could tell they kept a lot of the production staff at least at the high levels. All they had to do was keep things as they were as it was clearly working well.
Whether you like them or not, I’ve gotten a pretty clear impression that Amazon is a bit of a hack of a studio. There’s always a clear sense of something essential missing.
Surprising twists there about the tomb having been vacated by Egyptians due to flooding with the second tomb yet to be discovered.
Yea, a genuinely interesting take on Trump’s win was that single term Govts are the new normal.
As to why, that’s likely a whole discussion, but some hand wavy accelerationism shit show captures the energy sufficiently I’d say.
I’m not following international politics, but I’ve recently heard of the situation in Germany, and that seems on track to follow the same trend.
Ah yes! Thanks! The enhanced image does day “close up” after all! A bit lazy of me!
Very cool though! A zoomed inset in the main image would have helped I think.
I’m confused about what exactly the ring is in the image or the main image at least. There seems to be an enhanced image in the article that highlights the ring more clearly as an outer edge, which makes sense (I suppose).
But I don’t understand what I’m to make of the top image. It’s the diffuse light part of the ring?
That works way too fucking well I’m in stitches!
The Lighthouse (Eggers). Fucking great! I expected more of a horror thing going in, which kinda ruined a bit, so I had to rewatch it again to get into the vibe more. And yea, love that film and will definitely watch it again at some point. What a second entry after The Witch from Eggers!
Welcome!
As someone who used to be kinda similar, it can get kinda addictive! Don’t get too stressed about needing to post or anything, I’d say, but don’t get self conscious either I’d also say. It can be fun to post! And we’ll all be better for it!
Somehow I’m only seeing this reply now.
Like I said in a sibling response, I’m not from or in the US.
Otherwise, I was completely aware of what the character was a parody of. But I think that only contributed to my issues with the film.
Not because I’m a Trump supporter … I’m down for a parody of him any day, but because I don’t think it was done well or had anything to offer beyond what’s already out there generally … and yet, because it was a trump parody, we were all supposed to like or respect it?
If it was early or prescient (like, before 2016), sure, maybe, but in 2025, doing a trump thing without providing something meaningful and that helps us understand how he’s in power better, is probably a net negative TBH.