Organizing means getting people together and educated to take action. To use strength in numbers. Boycotts are nearly always done as individualistic moralizing campaigns. They are not organizing and they are vulnerable to PR, as their primary basis of communication is already basically PR.

They can have good effects and can help agitate, but you are absolutely, 100%, not going to take on the haute bourgeoisie with a boycott. It will register as decreased demand and then a recession, something they are happy to preside over. A recession means they, being the people with money to weather the recession while smaller businesses fail, get to cut wages, discipline labor, and then finally expand or buy up failed businesses as the recession recedes. Many of these effects are why BDS is a good idea for impacting “Israel”, as it needs to sell itself as a safe and attractive market for people to move and stay there as colonists.

To overthrow the bourgeoisie you need a revolution. This is not because anyone just loves fighting, but because the bourgeoisie will not leave you any other option. To organize for revolution you must join and contribute to a revolutionary organization.

Information density and transmission is polluted by the fears of not being convincing enough and not sounding radical enough.

It is just rhetoric on Johnstone’s website. It is a position piece. In what way are you being manipulated? This is actually more honest and direct than the faux-objectivity of typical articles.

[…] major world events do not occur independently of the actions of the major world powers who have a vested interest in their outcomes.

Sure, but this does not explain why Assad, North Korea or Putin are good enough for an opposition or even the seed of that.

It is unclear to me why you are quoting and arguing with that. Do you think I am Johnstone?

Not even the claim was on the books

Haha what if we apply more US bad to world events

Then you would have a more correct understanding of geopolitics.

No, seriously, that article is manipulative AF.

I have no idea what that means

That never existed

Gross

Osmand has a terrible user interface

I’m gonna download more copyrighted media today just because you told me not to.

lmao there are already very good “which programming language is this?” guessers but ratger than just use one they throw it at an incompetent black box.

Abolish with prejudice

Genocide Joe is giving unlimited support to the genocidal settlers.

lmao

“Still love the truck car though”

I gave you the specific, identifying terms for both things, you can easily look into them with a Google search. If you spend 5 minutes looking for each and come back and say you could not identify them, I will go fetch them for you.

So what was Hunter doing in 2014?

From the title alone, that is lovely. It suggests that no major, general toxins contaminate the area.

I mean that is very funny but don’t tip your hand like that. Start with a low-key unionization attempt, which begins with small stakes list building actions like “anonymously” signing a petition (you use the list to initially gauge interrst and the outcome of the petition to gauge the stance of management and choose next steps).

It’s Haz, a red-brown alliance reactionary grifter.

The Biden admin + Canadian targetinh of Samidoun and the domestic forces have been increased throughout the admin via direct funding of cops and supplying with military equipment along with fighting to keep and expand Trump-era national guard deployments using the insurrection act.

The Biden admin is already going after Palestinian solidarity orgs and ramping up powers to use the military domestically.