I’m asking if it worth spending more money on human developers to write code that isn’t slop.

Everyone here has been mentioning costs, but they haven’t been comparing them together to see if the cost of using human developers located in a high cost of living American city is worth the benefits.

Historically open source and closed source have done the same thing, so why is this one tool usage so wildly different?

Because, as noted by another replier, open source wants working code and closed source just want code that runs.

That’s basically my question. If the standards of code are different, AI slop may be acceptable in one scenario but unacceptable in another.

So I was trying to make a statement that the developers of AI for coding may not have the high bar for quality and optimization that closed source developers would have, then was told that the major market was internal business code.

So, I asked, do companies need code that runs quickly on the systems that they are installed on to perform their function. For instance, can an unqualified programmer use AI code to build an internal corporate system rather than have to pay for a more qualified programmer’s time either as an internal hire or producing.

Does business internal software need to be optimized?

As a dumb question from someone who doesn’t code, what if closed source organizations have different needs than open source projects?

Open source projects seem to hinge a lot more on incremental improvements and change only for the benefit of users. In contrast, closed source organizations seem to use code more to quickly develop a new product or change that justifies money. Maybe closed source organizations are more willing to accept slop code that is bad but can barely work versus open source which won’t?

40 miles? I thought this was in the TMZ.

He was an ok contributer to SNL, including being able to handle the news segment. So he has experience working in an environment that churns out content.

Using his skills from SNL, he was able to create a Late Night show which could bring people being interviewed into sketches and other entertaining interactions. He also lucked out in picking The Roots as the house band.

He’s great at bland humor for people to fall asleep to.

Hope it goes as well as CNN’s streaming service.

A lot of municipal and county work is pay to play. The well run counties will still fire poorly performing contractors and consultants, but it will typically require getting a foot in the door.

That doesn’t work at my state’s level, but that means you have to have a very good working relationship with the project managers running the various projects. I’ve seen some project managers make contractors do parts of their job; the contractors that do will maintain a better working relationship with their project managers.

Hollywood is also running into an issue where streaming has killed the profit model for a lot of movies & TV shows and no one knows what the replacement will look like.

And Hollywood doesn’t have a problem getting talent for cheap. That’s part of the reason why so many productions are across North America.

Reagan was able to act as a respectable president. His administration did horrible things, but at least he could act as someone respectable.

Yeah. People like to complain about American warmongering, but the period between World Wars I and II was orders of magnitude more deadly.

Not really. All American States have the same level of inherent sovereignty. There are also a lot of federal programs that rely the individual states performing the work. States also maintain their own militaries under partial or complete state control.

In contrast, UK country sovereignty is a mixed bag, with the largest country in the UK without any devolved powers.

The US generally views American state sovereignty more in line with EU country sovereignty.

I would put it more that there should have been an agreement on what Brexit would be pursued. The pro-Brexit camp promoted all forms of Brexit while there wasn’t a good idea on how Brexit would be implemented.

The UK still hasn’t solved the trilemma.

Is that why the USA attacked first?

It is only a curious price because most developers would choose a freemium model for a $10 game.

Genocide is just the extreme result of the problem with eugenics. It can also be used to justify excluding people based on race.

There is also the problem where genetics may describe populations, but individuals still vary within populations.

Is there a used electric truck old enough to be $20,000?

There may be a market.

The big 3 have been chasing larger trucks, effectively abandoning this market. I can see this being a farm truck that gets beat to shit.