Hotstillnasty@lemmy.world to Australia@aussie.zoneEnglish · edit-21 month agoThe greens may loose their leaderwww.abc.net.auexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down14
arrow-up140arrow-down1external-linkThe greens may loose their leaderwww.abc.net.auHotstillnasty@lemmy.world to Australia@aussie.zoneEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoWhat did it originally say? Btw it now says “loose”, when presumably you meant to say “lose”.
minus-squareBlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoI read it as they’re going to let him loose on everyone. Adam Bandt just running around off the leash and having a go.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoI suppose “loose” in this context could also be a much nicer euphemism for “knife”. As in “free him of the obligation of being party leader”. But that context would be if he retains his seat, but they’ve decided they no longer like his leadership.
minus-squareikt@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoit something like: are we going to hear about the evil left after greens leader loses his seat
What did it originally say?
Btw it now says “loose”, when presumably you meant to say “lose”.
I read it as they’re going to let him loose on everyone. Adam Bandt just running around off the leash and having a go.
I suppose “loose” in this context could also be a much nicer euphemism for “knife”. As in “free him of the obligation of being party leader”. But that context would be if he retains his seat, but they’ve decided they no longer like his leadership.
it something like: are we going to hear about the evil left after greens leader loses his seat